Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Mexico's dynamic north drives change

The techies fuel-injecting the economy helped vote Vicente Fox into office Sunday.

(Page 2 of 2)

Politically, the divide is of particular concern to the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which after 71 years in power was given the boot by the very segments of Mexico that are fueling the north's advance. The PRI learned Sunday that it has become fatally dependent on rural, older, and less-educated populations to retain political power.

Skip to next paragraph

While much of the "dynamic triangle" has experienced political alternation and is learning to live with an equilibrium among political forces, much of the south remains solidly in the PRI's hands. The list of the nine states where the PRI prevailed Sunday is virtually a duplicate of the list of the poorest and most rural states.

Yet a Mexico whose population is about two-thirds urban today will be 90 percent urban by 2020, demographers project. The country's future is more like what the north already is: more pluralistic and entrepreneurial.

"[Jurez] is a very democratic city, but it is not a city of people who feel dependent on the government," says Miguel Caldern Rodrguez, Jurez general director for Canacintra, the national manufacturing consortium. "In the south you still have the old class structure, with people dependent on the local cacique [community boss], but here despite our [population of 1.5 million] we don't even have a bankers' club."

The north's "wider spaces for the individual" mean that people trust more in what they make of themselves rather than who they know or are subject to, Mr. Caldern says. "It's an evolved Mexican mentality," he adds. "People are non-politicized, open to change, develop a strong work mentality, have smaller families."

With resources for social and economic development limited, some experts say Mexico needs to give priority to development in the "dynamic triangle" rather than wasting money on regions that are not competitive and able to take advantage of assistance.

"The government's limited resources for infrastructure, the environment, and other development needs should be focused on those areas that have shown they are competent at putting them to use," says Boris Graizbord, an urban development specialist in Mexico City. "That means the [areas] that have the greatest capacity to create good jobs, take advantage of the export economy, and to attract investment.

"Those are generally located along the corridors of development associated with NAFTA and that run from [Mexico City] north," adds Mr. Graizbord, who participated in the Mexico 2020 study.

Fox says he recognizes that more efficient states will employ scarce resources more profitably. But as president-elect of all Mexico he also recognizes that a lagging south can only be left behind at the country's peril.

Others say the advantages that Mexico's north is building on will eventually spread to much of the rest of country, similar to the way a backward south in the US evolved with the development of new industries.

The assembly plants that have mushroomed on the northern border - creating 225,000 jobs in Jurez alone - are spreading to other parts of the country as costs on the border rise.

But, failing to invest in the high-growth north, says Graizbord, will only increase the problems associated with the south, like extreme poverty. "That could mean lower living standards," he adds, "and eventually increased migration from the north to the US."

(c) Copyright 2000. The Christian Science Publishing Society