The wild market: not for timid
As investors are whipsawed by Wall Street's wild swings, many move from technology toward old-guard stocks.
NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON
Behind one of the most volatile periods in Wall Street's history - the financial equivalent of a volcanic explosion - several lessons are becoming apparent as investors sift through the dotcom ashes:Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
*The wild swings are sparking a shift in market psychology, with the high-flying tech stocks of the New Economy giving way to old-economy stalwarts.
*Small investors, who have poured billions of dollars into the markets, aren't being scared off the field of play - for now.
*The Federal Reserve, which has been steadily raising interest rates since last summer, is likely to stay its restrictive course, unimpressed by the market's pyrotechnics.
The volatility is coming at a time of stress in the markets, which are already struggling to adjust to higher interest rates. In addition, Microsoft, one of the market's biggest stocks, faces huge antitrust penalties.
"It's like nothing we've seen before," says Duncan Richardson, a portfolio manager for Eaton Vance Management in Boston.
Already this year, there have been 12 days when Standard & Poor's 500 index - a broad-based market indicator - rose or fell by more than 2 percent, compared with none in 1995. The more volatile Nasdaq has lost 16 percent of its value in just two weeks. Between last June and March, it was up 104 percent.
Market's wild ride
This volatility came to a head on Tuesday, when both the Nasdaq and the Dow Jones Industrial Average went on a one-day, 500-point roller-coaster ride, finally ending with relatively minor losses. In four hours of trading, the market had shed $1.2 trillion in value. Last year, the US government spent $1.7 trillion.
Individual companies saw their prices rise and fall like yo-yos. Internet infrastructure company Juniper Networks was worth $41 billion last Friday - and $33 billion Tuesday.
The carnage even hit big, traditionally stable stocks. American Express lost $4 billion in market value on Tuesday alone.
Even while the market churns, analysts are trying to figure out what it means for average American investors: Will the steep drop in the Nasdaq keep Americans from buying luxury goods, such as new BMWs or ski chalets?
Have speculators been so burned that they will stop treating the markets like a giant casino?
Stock market analysts believe the Nasdaq drop won't cause too many sleepless nights at the Federal Reserve. Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, in testimony, has warned about what he views as the overvaluation of some stocks.
"It's clear the Fed would like to see some sanity return to the market," says Heydon Traub, who heads asset-allocation strategies at State Street Global Investors in Boston. "Greenspan is happy to see a little correction in the most speculative area."
Despite the market correction, economists still expect to see the Fed raise interest rates another quarter of a percent when it meets on May 16, since there is scant evidence of a significant slowing in the economy.
Merrill Lynch & Co. economist Bruce Steinberg estimates the economy is now running at a 5.5 percent annual rate - down from a 7.3 percent rate in the fourth quarter of last year. This is far faster than the Fed wants. To further slow the economy, he expects the Fed will raise interest rates two more times.
But the Fed is also likely to watch for signs that the market's decline is having a negative impact on the "wealth effect," that is, the way Americans spend money. In the past, Mr. Greenspan has worried that rising stock prices prompt people to buy luxury goods.
With the market down, some of the dotcom millionaires may curtail their spending. Mr. Richardson says that, at least among people who are playing the markets, there may be lower consumer demand.
"Certain people are taking more risk than their bank account or stomach could tolerate," he says.
Consumer confidence dips, slightly
One sign this might be coming true: On Tuesday, the Conference Board released the Index of Leading Indicators, which declined by 0.3 percent. Part of the drop was attributed to the decline in stock prices.
However, economist Brian Fabbri of Paribas Capital Markets says the market decline is not likely to cause too much change on Main Street.
"While there may be some deterioration of confidence, it's gone from exuberant to just plain comfortable," he says.
In fact, at a Charles Schwab branch in Washington, the market's recent sell-off met with a yawn from some individual investors. Ismail Elmas of Falls Church, Va., says he's not concerned about short-term drops.
"It really doesn't affect me much," says Mr. Elmas, who owns mutual funds that invest in technology stocks as part of his retirement account.
Another investor, Adam, a Georgetown law-school student, actually wishes he had some cash to invest in the market now.
"There are a lot of people who haven't experienced ups and downs in the market and have only seen ups, and they might be overreacting," he says.
Still, the recent gyrations could cause some "aggressive" investors to drop out of the market.
"This is the beginning of the end of the wild, wild West style of investing," says Alan Skrainka, chief market strategist at Edward Jones, a brokerage house in St. Louis, Mo.
"The shake-out in the Nasdaq will cause a lot of people to realize that it's a new economy, but the old rules of investing still apply, and the most important is that price matters."
Over the short term, analysts like Sam Stovall, a senior strategist at Standard & Poor's, expects the market, including the Nasdaq, to move higher before selling off again.
"Yes, it's white-knuckle time," Mr. Stovall says, "but the volatility has gotten rid of those who did not have a grip on the market."
(c) Copyright 2000. The Christian Science Publishing Society