Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

A call to reclaim lost public values



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This

By Merle Rubin / September 16, 1999

FOR COMMON THINGS: IRONY, TRUST, AND COMMITMENT IN AMERICA TODAY By Jedediah Purdy Alfred A. Knopf 226 pp., $20

Over the past few years, there has been no shortage of provocative books decrying the current state of politics and culture in American society. Most recently, historian Andrew Delbanco surveyed the shrinkage of the American soul in his lucid and thoughtful "The Real American Dream" (reviewed Sept. 9).

But it is easier to enumerate problems than to come up with viable solutions. And often, those who do try to suggest a positive approach end up sounding vacuous or banal.

One sterling exception to this rule is Jedediah Purdy's "For Common Things." It is the kind of book one finds oneself recommending unreservedly to friends, colleagues, and neighbors. It is filled with trenchant insights, thoughtful analyses, solid suggestions, and a mature wisdom rarely found among would-be prophets and futurists, a wisdom all the more remarkable coming from a young man who is still a student at Yale Law School.

Looking around him, Purdy aptly diagnoses what is wrong with the tenor of our times: "Our idea of success is an almost unworldly prosperity and security, our idea of failure the unextraordinary existence that most of us actually lead."

A native of West Virginia who grew up on a farm, this young writer brings a strong sense of reality and common sense to the issues he discusses.

He also shows a sophisticated understanding of the various factors that have led many Americans to feel that politics is a dirty word. Purdy perceives a widespread attitude of ironic indifference, as citizens retreat, not only from taking an active part in politics, but even from talking and thinking about public issues: "The most prevalent attitude toward politics after indifference treats it as a hybrid of spectator sport and People magazine's celebrity culture," he notes. "The Sunday-morning talk shows are fodder for the sports-fan stance, providing competitive accounts of who's up, who's down, and what the smart money is on the coming week."

It is only recently, as Purdy points out, that the word "public" has become associated with "undesirable, inefficient, second-rate," and the word "private" endowed with an aura of privilege and desirability. But the word "public," he reminds us, means the people and is the source of "republic." Whereas the

etymological root of "private" is linked to "privation," someone or something denied the status of public life.

Purdy quite brilliantly links several seemingly unrelated manifestations of our dangerous retreat into the private realm. What does the gung-ho entrepreneur have in common with the credulous person who believes a guardian angel will fulfill her most trivial wish? Both, he claims, imagine that reality will automatically bend to their will. Both are in flight from the shared realm of action and discourse that is public life. So, too, is the individual whom Purdy calls the ironic skeptic: the person who "knows better" than to get involved in anything besides looking out for No. 1.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This