The Overworked American?Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The article "Long Workdays Draw Backlash" (Aug. 28) adds to the myth of the "overworked American," a misleading description of work experience in America. Data from the Current Population Survey show that since 1968, the length of the average work week for full-time workers has actually fallen slightly to 43.3 hours.
What has significantly increased over the last two decades is work hours of women. The share of women working full-time, year-round rose from less than 50 percent to more than 60 percent from 1976 to 1993. As a result, average hours worked per year by prime-age women increased by 45 percent. Prime-age men experienced no change. The share of women overtime workers has also increased in recent years, from 24 percent in 1979 to 34 percent in 1997.
Feelings of "overwork" may be the result of changes in family structure. Now that 70 percent of married-couple families have two working spouses, these individuals certainly feel additional pressure to balance the demands of work and home. But there is also evidence that today's workers overstate their work hours. Time-diary estimates in which respondents record their daily activities find that by the mid-1980s Americans had about five more hours per week of leisure time than in the 1960s.
Economist, Employment Policy Foundation
The popular economy
I think you missed the obvious in "Why the Political Split Between Public and Washington Elite" (Aug. 31). My daily intercourse with people supports the theory that it isn't the president they support, its the economy. Thus the question, "Do you approve of President Clinton's job performance?" is read, "Do you feel that the markets, interest rates, investment returns, etc., are acceptable?" I will [be interested to see if] his poll ratings will begin dropping like the NYSE did.
Humans in the wilderness
The article "In West, Close Encounters of the Cougar Kind" (Aug. 17) aptly focused reader's attention on the increased number of cougar sightings in the West. The author's commentary brought to mind an issue too often ignored: the irresponsible behavior of many human beings in the wilderness.
The wilderness is not Disney World. Nor is it a jogger's paradise. It is replete with untamed, potentially dangerous animals. Far too many Americans blithely set off on hikes through the wilderness ignorant of the most basic knowledge critical to their well-being and survival. Somehow, we must find a way to teach those Americans who continue to treat wilderness areas as if they were Disney World theme parks how to behave responsibly and respectfully toward our wilderness animals.
When the cat's away
I loved your article "Of Mice and Mice" (Aug. 31) on the inanimate, PC-version of a mouse, counterpoised against your encounter with the animate variety. It captured a newcomer's introduction to the world of "mice" so well. It made me chuckle - fixing a lethargic mouse with talcum powder, indeed.
I have been "mouse-ified" for a number of years now. Yet, I encounter problems occasionally with my mouse: not from dirt build-up, but from software incompatibility, that freezes the mouse or hides the mouse from human contact. Very frustrating at times. The article makes me look at my mouse in a new way. When I regard the mouse with a little more compassion, I may be able to move from frustration to amusement.
The Monitor welcomes your letters and opinion articles. Only a selection can be published, and we can neither acknowledge nor return unpublished submissions. All submissions are subject to editing. Letters must be signed and include your mailing address and telephone number.
Mail letters to 'Readers Write,' and opinion articles to Opinion Page, One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115, or fax to 617-450-2317, or e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org