How Indonesia Puts a Silent Hand on Those Who Talk Politics

By , Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

A group of professors and businessmen get together for dinner at a local hotel to talk about politics and economics. In most countries, this sort of activity is considered harmless, even dull.

Not in Indonesia. Here a seemingly innocuous seminar can become the focus of accusation and denial - and a good illustration of the way repression works in Southeast Asia's most economically and strategically important country.

In all likelihood, no one who attended this particular dinner in early February will be jailed. But onetime colleagues are no longer speaking to each other. A participant who sent a memo alerting the government about the meeting has gotten a better job. And people who care about politics in this country now have even more reason to think twice before talking in the presence of others.

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

"The trust has disappeared because of this controversy. It's very sad," says Anggito Abimanyu, a wiry and youthful university lecturer who took part in the fateful Feb. 5 seminar here in Yogyakarta. The city has a sophisticated, laid-back style that befits a place known for culture, education, and one of the royal families of Indonesia's main island of Java. There are few tall buildings, many of the streets are lined with flowering trees, and the local roofers favor a reddish clay tile that darkens with age and lichen.

In recent weeks the city's many students have given Yogyakarta an edgy air, repeatedly calling for the government of President Suharto to take responsibility for causing Indonesia's economic crisis. They want the poor protected from rising prices and unemployment, but they also want "reformation," a code word that to many people means an end to Mr. Suharto's 32-plus years in power.

Back in February Yogyakarta was calmer, although the talk of reformation had long since begun. Indonesia is not an Orwellian dictatorship where "war is peace" and the government alone says what truth is. But it nonetheless pays to hide behind euphemisms when discussing politics. Openly calling for Suharto to let someone else rule is out of the question; instead, people venture to wonder about "succession." The government has several blanket laws useful for imprisoning critics and closing offending publications.

Controversial meeting

In a country where the lines are invisible, it's hard to know if you've overstepped one until it's too late. That is what seems to have taken place in a conference room at the Radisson Yogya Plaza. The meeting's participants were part of an informal think tank led by Amien Rais, a political scientist at Yogyakarta's Gadjah Mada University.

Mr. Rais is also the leader of a Muslim organization that claims 28 million members. In Indonesia, where the majority of the population professes faith in Islam, Rais's religious activities give him unofficial political stature.

Several of Rais's colleagues from Gadjah Mada, including economics lecturer Abimanyu, attended the dinner, as well as some prosperous businessmen who are among his supporters. Professor Abimanyu says the group listened to papers on political, economic, and legal reform and discussed the economic crisis and the rescue package proposed by the International Monetary Fund.

Talk of 'people power'

There was talk of politics, he acknowledges, including some discussion of "people power," a phrase coined during the overthrow of the late Philippine president and dictator Ferdinand Marcos. Rais has mused aloud about resorting to "people power" if Suharto's government is unable to fix the economy, but only in abstract terms. Of the meeting in the Radisson, Abimanyu asserts, there was nothing subversive or revolutionary. "This was an open discussion," he says, intended to provide Rais with ideas and support. "We want him to be very constructive."

But one of the participants, a third Gadjah Mada instructor named Sofian Effendi, saw things differently. He submitted a memo on the meeting to then-Cabinet minister B.J. Habibie that painted the gathering as a plotting session for a popular uprising against the government. Mr. Effendi's account, according to press reports, singles out one businessman in particular as a potential promoter of revolt.

Police later questioned the businessman, although diplomats watching the case in Jakarta say it seems unlikely that he will be charged. The man himself, oil tycoon Arifin Panigoro, says the damage is done. "Being a suspect - of course it will affect any businessman's mentality," he told reporters last month. "Partners will reconsider their position."

'Treacherous people' rewarded

Mr. Habibie, who reportedly handed the memo to Suharto, has since been made vice president and has named Effendi as his adviser on globalization. Says Aristides Katoppo, a Jakarta-based journalist and publisher who has watched the scandal unfold, "This is how Suharto rewards these treacherous people." Effendi denies treachery, telling reporters that his memo was intended to protect his friends, not betray them.

Abimanyu says the uproar and speculation about the Radisson session has had other effects. For one thing, he says, many people are talking about an inconsequential meeting instead of the country's real problems. For another, the members of the think tank haven't met since February. Instead, he says, "We fight each other and blame each other, and we are confused."

He is an admirer of Rais, but fails to see why a man who strikes many Indonesians as the only ray of light in a political atmosphere darkened by Suharto has not defended his supporters from accusation and controversy. But analysts say that Rais, like any Indonesian with aspirations to lead an organized political opposition, is biding his time and consolidating support.

He has been busy firming his ties with Indonesia's all-important military, touring the country in an endless succession of speaking engagements, and lunching with the envoys of foreign governments.

In the meantime, it seems to be up to the students, in Yogyakarta and elsewhere, to press for change. With larger numbers and less to lose, they may have an advantage over their seniors.

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...