Inching Toward a Counsel

The best argument for appointing an independent counsel to investigate the fund-raising practices of last year's Clinton-Gore campaign has never been in doubt. Only an objective investigator is likely to get to the bottom of this matter, unimpaired by conflicts of interest and political pressures.

Attorney General Janet Reno has been inching toward - or away - from making this appointment. It's been hard to tell. Her latest decision, to extend Justice Department probes preliminary to naming an independent counsel, prolongs the suspense until Dec. 2.

The consensus of opinion out of Washington is that Ms. Reno will not appoint a counsel. She already has said her department had found no substantiation for broad charges against the president - e.g., that campaign funds came with promises of official favors. The scope of inquiry has narrowed to the White House phone calls. Did they violate an 1883 law that prohibits the solicitation of political funds on federal property?

Strictly read, that law could outlaw much of Washington's money culture. But it's commonly construed as a narrow ban on shakedowns of federal employees for political donations.

That's too small a lens for what's unfolding in this case. An independent counsel is needed, with the leeway to probe a wider range of charges.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK