EDITORIAL LETTERS

Gifted Students Need Special Treatment

The article "Mixing It Up in the Classroom," April 2, makes some good points about the advantages of heterogeneous classrooms, but it misses the point of why special classes are needed for gifted students.

Meeting the social and emotional needs of gifted students is an integral part of a curriculum for the gifted. Gifted students, in contrast to precocious students, think, process, and react to knowledge differently. Gifted students need a place to work with other gifted students. Teachers of the gifted should maintain an atmosphere where their students can explore and develop their abilities, free from ridicule for "showing off" and other anti-intellectual pressures of today's society.

The article implies that gifted classes have all the fun. Students in my district that participate in the resource room work hard but have the chance to explore areas and skills appropriate to their abilities. These often go above and beyond the basic curriculum.

All students are not the same; our gifted students are the future leaders of our country and society. We cannot afford to shortchange them.

Mark D. Wilkinson Solon, Ohio

President

Solon Education Association

Pakistan's national security at stake

The editorial "Cooling Asia's Other Crisis," March 28, is a welcome reminder of the proliferation concerns in South Asia. Since well before India's first nuclear explosion in 1974, Pakistan tried to contain this dangerous trend through its bilateral and multilateral proposals to India. These range from joint accession to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to declaring South Asia as a missile-free zone.

However, owing to Indian superiority in conventional weapons as well as its nuclear and missile capabilities, Pakistan cannot take any unilateral nonproliferation step as this would endanger its national security.

While we endorse the Monitor's proposal for a dialogue to curb the nuclear arms race in South Asia, the "short range" view - not to release arms contracted and paid for by Pakistan five years ago until after Indian elections - seems wholly unjustified. This is a purely bilateral Pakistan-US issue and, as we are told, US relations with Pakistan and India are not a zero-sum game. Moreover even a cursory reading of the Indian press shows that this transfer is hardly an issue in the Indian elections.

Mohammad Azam Washington

Press Attache

Embassy of Pakistan

Your letters are welcome. For publication they must be signed and include your address and telephone number. Only a selection can be published and none acknowledged. All letters are subject to editing. Letters should be addressed to "Readers Write" and may be sent by mail to One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115, by fax to 617-450-2317, or by Internet e-mail (200 words maximum) to OPED@RACHEL.CSPS.COM.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK