Order in the Trade Court

THE launching of the World Trade Organization a year ago culminated a half-century of international negotiation. But trade is an ever-prickly subject, and many had doubts that the WTO's enforcement mechanisms would work as hoped. Cases currently before the organization could resolve those doubts.

In January, a three-judge panel of the WTO ruled that US environmental laws governing the chemical makeup of gasoline unfairly shut out refiners from Venezuela and Brazil. The ruling brought an outcry from politicians - notably longtime free-trader Bob Dole - who said it infringed on US sovereignty. In fact, the laws do treat US and foreign gasoline differently.

Another noteworthy case involves a US charge that the European Union unfairly discriminates against American beef that's been treated with growth hormones. The US rightly asserts that scientific evidence refutes the Europeans. This case is just starting the adjudication process.

Both cases involve economic powers likely to be enmeshed in many trade disputes. Both will test the willingness of such countries to abide by international rulings.

These nations were instrumental in setting up the WTO's dispute-resolution procedures. They can now be instrumental in allowing them to work.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK