Health Care, GOP Style

HEALTH care reform will probably happen under the Clinton administration after all, but not as conceived by the president three years ago. Comprehensive reform has given way to budget-driven reform, and the concern now is whether this approach will maintain fairness as it imposes discipline on government programs.

Chief among those programs is Medicare, a health-care entitlement for the country's older citizens. The House Republicans would lop $250 billion off Medicare growth over the next seven years. Their Senate colleagues trim somewhat less, but both plans represent a sharp reversal of current trends. The president's budget plan cuts considerably less - $124 billion - but nonetheless reflects a recognition that the program has to be reined in.

The means of taming Medicare include greater emphasis on health maintenance organizations, the use of vouchers, and higher premiums for wealthier recipients. If these are applied with an eye to individual needs and ability to pay, fairness should be attainable. Many seniors themselves recognize that a balanced budget, as well as a healthy Medicare trust fund, demand sacrifice - and that all Americans have to share in it.

As for Medicaid, which serves the poor, the cuts are easier politically but harder ethically. This program reaches some 37 million, almost half children. Many elderly nursing home residents also depend on Medicaid.

The GOP approach here is block grants to the states, with a cap on how much the federal government would chip in. Minus Washington's guiding role, will the states do right by their poorer citizens?

Questions of supply and demand permeate the health care debate. How bloated and inefficient is the nation's network of hospitals? Given new incentives and options, what choices will the public, particularly the elderly, make?

Together, Medicare and Medicaid account for one-third of US health care spending. Cinching their budgets will cause the whole industry to take a deep breath and rethink its practices. There won't be a guiding hand from Washington, but there probably won't be the governmental intrusiveness that many saw in earlier "comprehensive" reform proposals either.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK