National Identity Forged With a Pen
(Page 2 of 2)
Nevertheless, Andersen inspired Jens Peter Jacobsen, who became the great stylist of the next generation and widely imitated, leading Larsen to conclude, "The idea that Andersen was somehow an aberration simply isn't true."Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
HANS CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN'S stories entered our consciousness as childish parables with themes durable enough to last through adulthood. The yearning of "The Little Mermaid," the absurdity of the crowd's blind allegiance in "The Emperor's New Clothes," and the eventual blossoming of the misfit "Ugly Duckling" are notions that pervade Danish cultural and political thought. But these and other Andersen tales are so universal that they are available today in 120 languages.
As for Blixen, at a time when Danish writers were rejecting romanticism and moving toward social realism, she was churning out Gothic tales of aristocratic intrigue in exotic settings. To countrymen engaged in the socialist movement, her ideas seemed hopelessly tangled in outmoded notions of class.
Blixen transformed the failure of her coffee farm in Africa into the triumph of a best-selling book that won even wider acclaim than the film, "Out of Africa." While Blixen's contemporaries were championing domestic social causes, she was composing pastoral prose extolling the virtues of African civilization and the Africans' intimacy with nature.
In "Sorrow Acre," quite possibly Blixen's masterpiece, she grapples with the conflict between the old order and the new - a recurring Blixen theme. In the story, a peasant woman tries to save her son from execution by reaping the field of a lord between sunrise and sunset - a task that would take the labor of four men. The episode is seen through the eyes of the aristocrat's repulsed nephew, who represents the new humanitarianism of his age.
To some, the piece defends the old way. But to me, it crystallizes the essence of Denmark today - a democratic, humanitarian society still wrestling with vestiges of the past.
While Blixen initially was panned by Danish critics, her bewitching personality made her a cult figure for a circle of young writers - men like Martin Hansen, Ole Wivel, and Thorkild Bjornvig, who would become important authors of their generation.
Andersen and Blixen, though out of step with their contemporaries, were undeniably original and clearly influential. Based on the response to the museums in their honor and the fact that they remain in print all over the world, it would seem that they have made a lasting mark.
Both, whether "typically Danish" or not, have contributed to the mingling of ideas that defines their culture. The intense interest in the museums devoted to these writers reveals that Danes feel a bond with those who have helped build their collective identity.
While strolling through the halls of the Andersen center and wandering the rooms of Blixen's manor house, I thought of how my own country treats its artists - particularly in an era when some politicians argue that public-funded art must meet a defined standard of artistic merit.
John Frohnmayer, the former head of the National Endowment for the Arts, told a gathering of newspaper editors in Washington that "the arts are fundamental to the democratic system because they demand involvement. Every child who has honestly written a poem or performed a song or dance has been forever changed. That child has made a covenant of honesty and risk - of communication and commitment to a community. That child has laid vulnerable a part of the self and has placed faith in the community to resp ond. That child has become a citizen."
Throughout history, many - perhaps even most - great writers initially were viewed with suspicion and misunderstanding. The Danes appear to be moving toward greater acceptance of them. The astonishing durability of this literary pair gives me hope that perhaps in the not-too-distant future, the apologies on their behalf will cease.
After being open less than a year, the H. C. Andersen House in Nyhavn recently was forced to close temporarily, due to lack of funding. Jorgen Rossen, who privately bankrolled the project, said he could no longer afford upkeep of the property, in spite of its popularity. At press time, the Danish Tourist Board was assisting in a search to find investors for the house.