Canadian Rejection of Unity

Quebec reminds me of a teenager who will not live by the house rules. It wants to move out of the house or stay and live by its own rules with special status. The parents, however, have to pay all the costs.

The proposals do not embrace the principle of representation by population. To get Quebec's agreement, the proposal guaranteed it 25 percent of the members of the Commons; its population, however, is shrinking and is already just over 24 percent. This is my major objection to the proposals. The proposals give more weight to collective rights than to individual rights. Many interpret Quebec's strategy as a means to maintain French supremacy by law if it cannot do it by population.

The proposals do give more political force and autonomy to the Indians. This is an important part of the deal and long overdue. V. Hoeppner, Saskatchewan

Letters are welcome. Only a selection can be published, subject to condensation, and none acknowledged. Please address them to "Readers Write," One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK