Schools Grapple With AIDS Issues
Content of mandated courses dealing with prevention creates controversy in some states
SEX education in public schools has always been a sensitive issue. Since the advent of AIDS education, the level of urgency and controversy surrounding the topic has increased dramatically.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
"The AIDS epidemic has caused a willingness on the part of school systems and parents to be more explicit with young people rather than less," says Debra Haffner, executive director of the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States in Washington, D.C.
In the early '80s, schools began outlining policies for responding to students and employees who had AIDS, says Brenda Greene, manager of AIDS education at the National School Boards Association in Alexandria, Va. "Gradually it has evolved into the need to educate for prevention."
In 1986, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop called on public schools nationwide to implement AIDS education "at the lowest grade possible."
Rhode Island passed the first mandate for AIDS education in February 1987. Today, 34 states require AIDS education, and 14 states encourage it.
Despite the contentiousness of the debate over AIDS education, everyone seems to agree on the goal: to prevent behavior doctors say spreads AIDS. Yet, in many cases, deciding on the best way to meet that goal isn't proving easy.
Nowhere is the debate more volatile than in New York City. Last year the city's Board of Education approved free distribution of condoms in high schools. About two dozen school districts across the US have followed New York's lead.
A more recent controversy in New York surrounds abstinence-based AIDS education. Throughout the US, parents, teachers, and AIDS educators are arguing about how much emphasis should be placed on abstaining from sexual intercourse as the only sure prevention of AIDS.
In April, the New York Board of Education approved a resolution requiring that all AIDS education in the city's schools emphasize sexual abstinence more than other prevention methods, such as the use of condoms.
All instruction relating to AIDS prevention "must stress that abstinence is the most appropriate premarital protection against AIDS," states the resolution.
Any community or health group wanting to come into classrooms for AIDS education is required to sign a form pledging adherence to the resolution.
State regulations, passed in 1991, already require all teachers to stress abstinence in AIDS-prevention instruction, says Christopher Carpenter, a spokesman for the state Department of Education in Albany, N.Y.
The current controversy surrounds the boundaries of discussion for outside AIDS educators who come into New York City classrooms.
More than 40 of some 200 AIDS-education groups in New York have refused to sign the abstinence pledge. Many AIDS educators argue that it is unrealistic to talk to students about abstaining from sexual intercourse. Stressing abstinence further alienates adults from teens, they say.
"Sexuality education and HIV education is hard enough to accomplish without measuring your words and making sure that within a single class you are talking more about abstinence than other things," Ms. Greene says. "Particularly if you are going to allow kids to ask questions and really try to meet the needs of the kids who are there."
"The fact is that sexual intercourse is normative behavior in the United States for adolescents," Ms. Haffner says.
Seventy-two percent of high school seniors say they are sexually active, according to a study released this year by the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta.
"Of course we want to talk to young people about abstinence," Haffner says. "We need to tell them that abstinence is the only 100 percent effective method [of preventing HIV infection]."