Giving Horror Flicks A Bad Name

FILM: REVIEW

I DON'T spend a lot of time watching horror movies, much less reviewing them. But the things don't seem to go away - there's always a new crop, a new style, a new trend - and you can't just ignore things that don't go away. Supernatural thrillers have a long and sometimes distinguished history, too. Pictures like the original ``Dracula'' and ``Frankenstein'' are genuine classics, and there's always the chance that somebody will come along and revitalize the horror scene, making it important again - the way George A. Romero almost did with ``Night of the Living Dead'' back in the '60s.

Still, I must admit I rarely see a horror film with much to recommend it. There's certainly little to praise in ``The Guardian,'' which relies so heavily on clich'es that you feel more deja-vu'd than scared.

The main character is - well, a babysitter; only ``guardian'' makes a classier title. She's not an ordinary babysitter, though. She's a leftover Druid from ancient time, and instead of caring for children, she sacrifices them to a tree-god out in the woods. This gives her eternal life, as long as she can keep up the payments - I mean sacrifices - and she says it gives the babies eternal life, too. But somehow this doesn't impress the parents she works for, and most of the movie is about a rip-snorting battle between her and her latest employers, a very worried mom and dad.

``The Guardian'' was directed by William Friedkin, who used to be an interesting filmmaker. He started his career with such noteworthy pictures as ``The Birthday Party,'' from a Harold Pinter play, and ``The French Connection,'' a rather crude but hugely popular drama that strongly connected with early-'70s audiences.

He went on to make epics like ``Sorcerer,'' badly underrated, and ``The Exorcist,'' badly overrated but definitely one of the grandaddies of today's horror movies. It was a gigantic hit in 1973, and ever since Mr. Friedkin has been trying different genres in his attempt to make another smash just as big - with results like ``The Brink's Job'' and ``Deal of the Century,'' which seemed to impress hardly anyone, and ``To Live and Die in L.A.,'' which some critics liked better than I did.

In his new movie he tries to re-create ``The Exorcist'' on its own horror-movie turf. But as bad as ``The Exorcist'' was, in my opinion, ``The Guardian'' is even worse. The plot is crazy; the characters are ordinary, except the guardian herself, who simply doesn't make sense; and the violence is unbelievable - really unbelievable, as well as unbelievably stupid. I enjoyed seeing Jenny Seagrove again (she was the mermaid in ``Local Hero'' a few years ago) but I wish it could have been in better circumstances. ``The Guardian'' is a dud.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK