Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Life of Luther Is a Meditation on Modernity

A new biography of the great Christian reformer strips away the words and legends to reveal the real, historical man

By Thomas D'EvelynThomas D'Evelyn is general editor for the humanities at Harvard University Press. / February 9, 1990

LUTHER: MAN BETWEEN GOD AND THE DEVIL by Heiko A. Oberman, translated by Eileen Walliser-Schwarzbart,

Skip to next paragraph

New Haven: Yale University Press, 380 pp., $29.95

EVERY good book has a secret. The secret of Heiko Oberman's ``Luther'' takes us deep into the heart of time. What looks like a biography turns out to be a profound meditation on modernity.

Was Martin Luther (1483-1546) modern or medieval? On the surface, it appears that Oberman has exhausted all the paradoxes of this question.

He shows how, as a promoter of ``ecumenical pluralism'' the great reformer looks modern, yet how Luther opposed the concept of history fashionable at the time. ``Very much counter to the temperament of his age - and of later, `modern' times,'' Oberman says, ``Luther took a vigorous stand against all efforts to wrest from God His timetable, and to force - with sword in hand - the coming kingdom of peace.'' Indeed, says Oberman, ``Luther was proclaiming the last days, not the modern age.''

Oberman also says that ``the fact that Luther cannot be classified either as medieval or modern may also explain his special gift of presenting anew the original Christian message of the imminent dawning of the kingdom, vivid and vital, real and realistic for people of his time.'' And not only of his time: Throughout this book, Luther seems to be addressing our modernity, or postmodernity. For Luther, reform does not mean upgrading but returning to something pristine; for Luther, reformation is God's ultimate intervention.

Unlike most biographers of Luther, Oberman shows that, with ``self-confident burghers as parents,'' Luther ``was born into a modern world.'' But his mother, who, Oberman shows, was from a prosperous, well-educated family, believed in the devil, as did her son.

Oberman says: ``Centuries separate Luther from a modern world which has renounced and long since exorcized the Devil, ... Consequently he, unlike any theologians before or after him, was able to disperse the fog of witches' sabbath and sorcery and show the adversary for what he really was: violent toward God, man, and the world.'' Oberman's phrasing is packed with emotion: This biographical study shows Luther ``as he was'' just as Luther showed the devil ``for what he really was.''

Throughout this book, it's fascinating to see Oberman doing to Luther what Luther did to the Christian tradition: stripping away mere words and legends, getting back to the real, historical thing.

Oberman's own lifework has been explaining the provenance of this method by exploring the role of the Englishman William of Occam (who died in 1349 in exile in Munich) in early modern times. Luther's method of reform (one could almost say research) follows Occam in testing all speculation ``by means of experience and reality-based reason, regardless of what even the most respected authorities might say to the contrary.''

Occam's via moderna (modern way) was set against the via antiqua of the church. Thus when Luther translated the Bible into German, he learned Hebrew and Greek, the original languages, and felt free to dismiss centuries of ecclesiastical commentary. Luther's breakthrough came after he rejected the idea that monks like him were more spiritual, when he discovered that there was a direct ratio between Christ and the devil. The church is no sinecure. Nor can the church forgive the sins of those who contribute to the building of St. Peter's in Rome!