Qaddafi's `charm offensive' leaves US unimpressed

In the eyes of many Washington policymakers, Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi has three big strikes against him: terrorism, chemical weapons, and a desire to expand his political clout. These make it much tougher for the United States to make any move that appears to ease the pressure on Colonel Qaddafi.

Although evidence of Libyan-supported terrorism diminished after the US bombed Tripoli in 1986, US counterterrorism chief L.Paul Bremer III recently told Congress that ``there is clear evidence that Qaddafi is back in the business of supporting terrorism.''

The notorious Abu Nidal Organization (ANO), for example, maintains its headquarters in Libya. Its agents are believed to have carried out several lethal terrorist attacks this year, including a foiled hijacking of a tourist cruise ship in Greece. In that attack, ANO operatives used Libyan passports and weapons that had been earlier sold to the Libyan government.

US antiterrorism specialists also believe Libya was connected to anti-American terrorist attacks attempted in Italy, Spain, and the US earlier this year.

The US and Libya's neighbors are concerned over reports that Libya has constructed a major chemical weapons facility and is trying to buy ballistic missiles.

CIA director William Webster says the Libyan chemical plant is the largest his agency has detected anywhere. ``If the intelligence estimates are right,'' says a ranking US official, ``this plant could match US annual production'' of chemical weapons.

Libya used chemical weapons, provided by Iran, against Chadian forces last year, US officials say.

On top of these concerns, Washington is worried about Libya's growing influence in Africa. As part of a public relations offensive, US officials say, Qaddafi has been spreading aid largess with apparent success. This comes as US aid for Africa has been slashed by budget austerity.

``Libya is making real inroads at our expense,'' says a senior administration official. In the normally pro-Western Sudan, for example, Libya is providing ammunition, oil, and trucks to a military struggling with a costly civil war.

In Somalia, Qaddafi is rushing in military aid to the authoritarian government of Siad Barre, which is fighting rebel forces. The US has a military contingency agreement with the government, but even before the current fighting Washington had not met Somalia's requests for increased military aid. Congress recently froze economic aid because of alleged human rights abuses.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK