Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

`Life care' meets a need - at high cost. RETIREMENT PLANNING

By Kerry Elizabeth KnobelsdorffStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / September 18, 1987


``Life-care used to mean a widow sold her husband's farm and gave the money to a church which would take care of her for the rest of her life,'' says David Crowley, chief administrator at the National Association of Senior Living Industries. Today, the concept includes church-run and proprietary centers. And what was once a common pool of widows' estates has evolved into a full-service institution, many of which cater to the affluent. Major developers like the Marriott Corporation are in the process of building proprietary luxury complexes to house the growing population of independent elderly.

Skip to next paragraph

Simply put, buying into a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) involves signing a contract, putting down a substantial amount of money - ranging from $40,000 to $96,000 - for an apartment, and paying monthly fees for a range of added services.

Depending on how many services residents want, they can get a fee-for-service, modified, or all-inclusive contract, with fees starting at $900 a month and reaching $2,500 a month for the most inclusive, according to the National Continuing Care Data Base.

Many include such extras as libraries, exercise programs, religious services, private dining, and saunas. And about two thirds of all CCRCs will refund the residents' down payment when the person leaves.

But the real plus is the provision of nursing care, whenever and for however long it is needed.

``They're mini-mutual SHMOs,'' or health maintenance organizations that are also social organizations, says Larry Laird, who is an executive at the Forum Group, an Indianapolis developer who has worked in both church-run and corporate-owned CCRCs.

The up-front cost is typically equivalent to the price of the house most residents sell before they move in. By getting this money at the beginning, the facility doesn't have to borrow in the commercial market, which greatly reduces its costs and keeps its monthly fees down. Lower costs are what enable the life care community to provide nursing care to its residents at a discount rate.

It is for this reason that residents are accepted only if they can lead an independent life style, says Jesse Lee, executive director at North Hill, a life-care community in Needham, Mass. To keep costs down, she says, they can't require care from Day 1. If they need care after that, however, it is available.

There are now about 600 CCRCs in 40 states, housing more than 120,000 elderly residents. Many have extensive waiting lists. Several studies indicate that the number of CCRCs may double in the next decade.

``There is a great deal of interest in providing full-service communities for the elderly,'' says Deborah Cloud, an official of the American Association of Homes for the Aging, ``because of the increasing number of older people and their improved financial status.''

Several recent failures, however, have drawn increased attention to the fact that the industry is not directly regulated by the federal government.

Although the life-care concept itself is not new, its more recent sophisticated packaging and growing size is, and as a result, most states haven't had much contact with them.

But they are catching on. Consumer protection statutes have been passed in 21 states. And in states that already have several CCRCs, they are ``well watched,'' Ms. Cloud says. The American Academy of Actuaries recently published a set of standards for judging continuing-care communities.