Peking's lesson

THIS week's gathering of China's National People's Congress in Peking stands in sharp contrast to the recent meeting of the Soviet Communist Party Congress in Moscow. In Moscow, the underlying objective of Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was to initiate just enough reform within the Soviet bureaucracy to prod the nation's stodgy economy into growing. In Peking, by contrast, the task is just the opposite. Peking needs to apply the brakes to get the nation's rapid growth under control.

The difference in the economies of the two nations is both startling and instructive. Peking's new five-year plan calls for China to grow about 7.5 percent annually between 1986 and 1990. But that is down substantially from the 10 percent annual levels reached during the first half of this decade. The challenge, as China's political leaders now realize, is to avoid the big economic problems usually linked with overrapid growth, including high inflation and balance-of-payments deficits.

China's current robust growth stands in sharp contrast to the sluggish Soviet economy. China has opted for a form of market-led growth. The Soviets have chosen a more modest rejiggering of the government's central planning machinery. Peking has shown the third world -- and communist-bloc nations -- that it is possible to link ideological fervor with economic modernization.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK