Wrong tactics

The American Civil Liberties Union is making a valid point in complaining about US government tactics in its case against the church sanctuary movement in Arizona. The ACLU is contending that government agents' infiltration of churches violates basic constitutional principles. Appealing to a number of judicial precedents, the ACLU is asking a federal court to suppress evidence obtained by government informers without any judicial approval.

One does not have to agree with either the objectives or the tactics of the sanctuary movement to see the ACLU's point in this matter. The immigration movement from Central America into the United States is an overwhelming problem. The sanctuary movement, perhaps well-intentioned in its humanitarian emphasis, has oversimplified the problem and made little contribution to a long-run solution.

But the answer does not lie in government agents or informers infiltrating churches, especially without any judicially-approved court order.

Government infiltration of churches strikes a clear blow at the First Amendment provision for freedom of religion. The ACLU is correct in condemning these un-American tactics in response to the sanctuary movement.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK