Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


The butterfly of Atlanta

By Robert M. PressStaff correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor / December 26, 1980



Atlanta

After decades of neglect, Inman Park is being painted, polished, swept, and sanded back into the kind of neighborhood where people want to live. Developed in the 1880s just outside Atlanta's city limits, two miles from downtown, Inman PArk attracted wealthy families who built large Victorian homes. Smaller homes were built later as the development expanded.

Skip to next paragraph

But as more distant suburbs attracted the wealthy, Inman Park began a long decline. By the 1950s, many of the big old homes had been bought by absentee landlords -- "slumlords," according to today's residents. Many homes were divided into as many apartments as the owner could squeeze in; upkeep was minimal.

Inman Park's recovery is a tale of people eager enough for clean, comfortable , in-town living to fight the city hall, the statehouse, and Washington to get it. And its metamorphosis --be traced in part to a soggy, could November day in 1968.

Robert Griggs was in Inman Park that day to appraise stained glass in the home of a local judge fighting condemnation of his stately old house for a highway that was to split the neigborhood. One of the houses caught his eye.

"It was very decayed, but still be very proud. It was just romantic beyond hope," he says. And like most of the old homes in the neighborhood, it was also a wreck.

The big oak doors of the three-story, Queen Anne-style house were nailed open. The hallway was "like a public street," Mr. Griggs recalls. Kids were playing basketball in it; derelicts wandered through it.

The 15-room house had been divided into eight apartments, some with five people in them. Rent was paid weekly.

The front yard was a sea of red mud. Broken glass, three abandoned cars, and great piles of garbage littered the backyard.

But Griggs saw hints of a beauty that defied the ravages of neglect: a handsome, curving main stairway; oak and mahogany floors; flowers carved in some of the woodwork.

"I fell instantly in love with the house," he says. He told a real estate friend he wanted to buy it. His friend told him he was crazy. But he bought it anyway.

Gradually others followed his example. A wave of renovation -- in its final stages today -- began.

The first banner used by this group of urban "pioneers" -- a red flag with a white stripe -- was later replaced by the butterfly. Almost unnoticed in the butterfly are the silhouettes of two faces: one looking backward at the neighborhood's past, the other looking ahead to its future.

Today, butterfly banners hang from windows or flutter from porches throughout the roughly three-by-eight-block neighborhood.

Many of the early renovators were far from rich. When they arrived in the early 1970s, they had no assurances thier investment would ever pay off. What they sought was in-town living in homes they liked enough to overhaul.

But Inman PArk's restoration during the 1970s involved more than just fixing up houses.

"The fabric of the community had disintegrated," Griggs says. People were just not working together, he remembers.

Besides the threat of the proposed highway, the neighborhood was beset by zoning regulations that discouraged families owning homes, a high crime rate, rubbish everywhere, rats, and the refusal of many local financial institutions to make loans at normal rates to Inman Park property owners.

"It was a slum -- any way you cut it," Bill McMurry, a longtime resident of the area, says.

"Virtually every problem that can face a neighborhood was faced by that neighborhood," Joe Drolet, an assistant district attorney in Atlanta and past president of Inman Park Restoration, says.

IPR, which Griggs helped form in 1970, is the neigborhood improvement organization that became the focal point for volunteer resident action to reclaim Inman Park as a decent place to live.

The IPR, kind of spirit shows up in a new Gallup poll, taken in 1977.