The snake in textbooks; "It was once believed that snakes thought with every part of their part of their bodies."; R. G. Otis, "Snakes of Asia"

The snake in textbooks doesn't mind or know that he is being observed as if he were layers of sediment or rings on a tree Or rather, his tail knows as much as his body does, or his head, (And which is which, body or tail, is a problem as evocative as that of graded mists or rolle-up socks). This fact of ambiguity underlies all his intelligence and all his beauty. (Looped into pure parabolas, he is so beautiful he might be translated into numbers.) The snake in textbooks doesn't mind or know. While often admired as a made thing, for the back basketwork, and the little clear stone eyes, inlaid, which stare at us from the photographs, it is the science explicit in every link -- his every turn burnishing the adjacent air -- the moving Arabic the staying still his entire originality the inscribed moment for which we applaud him here.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK