A magazine without a country?

The founding of Harper's New Monthly Magazine 130 years ago "marked the end of the old era" in american magazines, according to history. Does the forthcoming demise of Harper's mark the end of more than a magazine on the American scene? Has the American public intellect reached a point where it can sustain all sorts of hobby, service, special-interest, sexual-interest magazines -- but not the eldest of the small surviving band of "quality" magazines on general and literature affairs?

It was not so much a matter of circulation as of advertising, say the Harper's post mortems. Today's owners deserve credit for not selling out to would-be buyers who would not maintain the magazine's editorial independence. Yet they could not find the right buyer to relieve them of the drain of annual losses. A far cry from the early days when a rival magazine publisher who was threatened by the success of Harper's complained: "The owners of Harper's have no right to win the stakes; they are rich enough already."

Success a century ago was measured in 100,000 readers rather than the three times as many Harper's has today. When 300,000-plus people are interested in a quality product, shouldn't America find a way to serve them? It appears to be a case not of the vanishing audience but of American enterprise failing to be quite enterprising enough.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK