‘Golden visas’: Europe tightens residency rules for the rich

|
Erika Page/The Christian Science Monitor
Benjamin Trotter, who is waiting for his Portuguese golden visa to be approved, sits on a bench in Madrid, April 11, 2024.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 4 Min. )

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, a number of European countries started to raise money by selling residency rights, and sometimes citizenship, to wealthy foreigners. That could cost as much as a million dollars, and between 2011 and 2019 Europe raked in an estimated $22 billion.

But now a number of governments are having second thoughts. Some are tackling affordable housing crises, which is harder if you allow people to qualify for a visa by buying expensive houses.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

“Golden visas” are meant to offer quick access to residency in a country in exchange for a large investment. But governments are now wondering: Is that sort of deal beneficial to their societies?

Other countries point to the security risks of selling residency permits to the highest bidder.

Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Bulgaria, Latvia, and Britain are among the nations that have tightened the rules governing “golden visas.”

But the days of the golden visa are not over yet. Investors in sectors that governments want to encourage – such as sustainable agriculture or scientific research – can still qualify for residence in a number of places. It’s just that buying a house is no longer enough.

Benjamin Trotter, an American hoping for Portuguese residency, got his application in under the wire, before the government cracked down.

It won’t be long, he says, until he can “put some roots down ... but I need the legal right to do so.”

In his Tennessee high school valedictorian speech in 1998, Benjamin Trotter invoked Socrates: “I am neither Athenian nor Greek, but a citizen of the world.”

Fast-forward two decades, and Mr. Trotter began to feel less at home in his own country. Worn down by divisions in American society, he began to fantasize about living in a place where he wouldn’t have to worry about the erosion of his rights as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. His gaze turned to Europe.

Being a citizen of the world, though, comes with a steep price tag: €350,000 ($377,000).

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

“Golden visas” are meant to offer quick access to residency in a country in exchange for a large investment. But governments are now wondering: Is that sort of deal beneficial to their societies?

That’s on the low end for what is known as a “golden visa,” a document that grants residence to investors who make a significant contribution to a country’s economy. In exchange for Mr. Trotter’s investment, Portugal would grant him residency, giving him access to the entire European Union and, eventually, one of the most accepted passports in the world.

Since he applied, though, the tide across Europe has begun to turn against residency-by-investment programs, set up in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis to attract foreign capital.

Last month, Spain became the latest country to announce the end of a golden visa program for real estate, following recent moves by Portugal, Ireland, Bulgaria, Latvia, and the United Kingdom. Some politicians say they are trying to tackle affordable housing crises worsened by recent influxes of wealthy foreigners. Others point to the security risks of selling residence permits to the highest bidders.

The shift in policy reflects a deeper challenge facing Europe when it comes to regulating the future of globalization. The growing expectation of free mobility is coming up against concerns about who gets to reap its benefits – and under what conditions.

​​“European values are not for sale,” said Didier Reynders, EU commissioner for justice and consumers, in a 2022 press release urging member states to retract their golden passport programs. Whether that’s true in practice is another question.

​​“It’s not the end of the golden visa,” says Paula Schmid Porras, a Spanish immigration lawyer and professor of law at the University of Seville. Applicants in Spain, for example, can still qualify by investing in sectors the government is seeking to encourage. “If you’re poor and an immigrant, it’s difficult” to earn residency in Spain and other countries, she adds. “But if you’re rich, you have a red carpet.”

Carlos Luján/Europa Press/Reuters
Spain’s Housing Minister, Isabel Rodríguez García, speaks after the government abolished the “golden visa,” which had been offered to foreigners investing over €500,000 in housing.

Russians, Chinese, and Iranians the big golden visa winners

Golden visa schemes emerged in the 1980s, first in the Caribbean, and then in Canada and the United States. The trend gained popularity in Europe in the early 2010s as governments looked to boost struggling economies. In Spain, foreign capital helped restore a collapsed real estate market.

The programs tend to have few requirements, in some cases needing only a short visit to the country each year. While some promise full citizenship, others offer residency rights and a pathway toward naturalization. Their prices range from €150,000 to over €1 million, earning Europe an estimated €21.4 billion between 2011 and 2019.

During the pandemic there was a surge in interest in golden visas among Americans looking for lifestyle alternatives. But the largest share of beneficiaries are those whom researcher Kristin Surak has called “the non-Western winners of globalization.” In Spain, the majority of golden visa recipients are elites from Russia, China, and Iran, says Ms. Schmid Porras.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 prompted the EU to worry more about security considerations; the EU Commission urged member states to end their investor citizenship schemes and tighten controls on investor residency programs. Concerns about money laundering and other illicit activities pushed Ireland, the U.K., Bulgaria, and Latvia to scrap their golden visa programs. But Hungary, the EU country most sympathetic to Moscow, is relaunching its golden visa.

“The risk arises when there are no proper checks on the procedures,” says Roland Papp, a senior policy advisor with Transparency International, an anti-corruption watchdog. He says business partners of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad gained EU residency through a Hungarian investment program. The EU took Malta to court in 2022 for a golden passport program it says doesn’t meet European law.

Whose houses are they, anyway?

Others are pushing back against the local ramifications of an increasingly globalized world. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez announced the end of his country’s real estate golden visa in an effort “to guarantee that housing is a right and not a mere speculative business.”

In 2023, a record 15% of the homes sold in Spain were bought by foreigners, and double that in some provinces like the Balearic Islands and Valencia. Many become short-term rentals for tourists.

Yet those in the real estate industry say the decision won’t do much to ease Spain’s housing woes. Less than 0.6% of the homes sold in 2023 were bought through the golden visa scheme, according to property website Idealista.

“They needed to blame someone,” says Mr. Trotter, sitting at a sunny cafe in Madrid. “In reality, they love the investment.”

Like Spain, Portugal scrapped its golden visa for real estate investments last year. But hopeful residents with the resources can still invest in qualifying sectors ranging from sustainable agriculture to culture and scientific research.

Those types of programs make a difference “for the progress and development of that country,” says Joana Mendonça, head of the legal department at Global Citizen Solutions, an investment migration firm.

“The ability to move around the world and to travel and to seek the best place for one to settle – I think this is something we should facilitate,” she adds. Yet she acknowledges that “not everyone is able to invest that amount of money.”

Mr. Trotter, too, knows it’s a privilege to be choosing where his spot in the world might lie.

“It was simply the luck of the draw of being born on a certain soil,” he says. “To turn a blind eye [to other migrants] seems irresponsible.”

He applied for his golden visa in 2021, before Portugal’s recent restrictions. As he waits for it to be processed, he has hopped from Mexico to Spain to Italy, exploring an artistic side of himself through pottery and sculpture that used to lie dormant in the U.S.

“I do want to put some roots down and start creating a community, but I need the legal right to do so,” he says.

In the meantime, he’s still working to emulate Socrates, with no regrets about leaving his home country behind: “It’s really nice to be away from that hamster wheel.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to ‘Golden visas’: Europe tightens residency rules for the rich
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2024/0514/golden-visa-europe-portugal-spain
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe